
back to main page
|
Information.Resources |
|

|
|
Hijab - an obligation |
|
Holy Quran
Al-Ahzab:
(59)
O Prophet! Tell thy wives and thy daughters and
the women of the believers to draw their cloaks close round them (when they go
abroad). That will be better , that so they may be recognized and not annoyed.
Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful.
|
Add to favourites
Set as homepage
Contact us
|
|
European
Parliament Project - Replies from MEPs |
MEP members who have signed the Written Declaration. For a full listing
please click here
|
United Kingdom |
<<
Back
16th Mar /2005
<<
Back
25th Feb /2005
|

Written Declaration Signatory
Dear Mohammed Basha,
Thank you for your email about the written declaration on
religious rights
and freedoms in France and throughout the European Union.
I can confirm that I will be signing the declaration.
Yours sincerely
Gary Titley MEP
gtitley@europarl.eu.int |
<<
Back
25th Feb /2005
|
Thank you for your email
I respect the right of sovereign countries like France to
legislate on domestic matters such as dress code in their public
institutions such as schools and public buildings.
France has a longstanding secular tradition going back to the
French revolution and understandably does not wish to break a
formula which has successfully integrated into the mainstream of
French society generations of immigrants from all corners of the
globe. It is noteworthy that the French legal ban on the Hijab is
part of a wider package against any ostentatious religious symbol
e.g. turbans, skullcaps or crucifixes which may appear to divide
schoolchildren from each other but discrete symbols which are not
making ostentatious political or religious statements will be
permitted.
Also, it is interesting that a ban on the hijab in schools is
present in two Muslim countries, Turkey and Tunisia, as it is
regarded there as part of their secular traditions of government.
The UK is different as we unlike France do not have a tradition of
secular government and indeed have state funded faith schools.
For the reasons outlined above I regret that I cannot support your
campaign against the French law banning the hijab in schools.
Best wishes
Yours sincerely
Neil Parish
nparish@europarl.eu.int
|
<<
Back
23rd Feb /2005
<<
Back
23rd Feb /2005
|

Written Declaration Signatory

John Bowis MEP
Conservative Member of the European
Parliament for London |
Thank you for your message. I do support you on this and signed
the declaration organised by my Colleague, Philip Bushill-Matthews
MEP, before the last election to the European parliament.
Best wishes
John Bowis MEP
jbowis@europarl.eu.int
|
<<
Back
23rd Feb /2005
|

Written Declaration Signatory

Ian Hudghton
MEP
Scottish National Party
Member of the European Parliament |
Dear Khalid
Many thanks for your email - I have no hesitation in signing the
Written Declaration on freedom of religious dress. I can see no
benefit in banning visible articles of faith be they the hijab,
cross, turban or whatever. Everyday life in France, and the rest
of Europe, operates satisfactorily without the imposition of
religious dress restrictions on EU citizens.
There are of course possible wider implications that restrictions
on what people wear might impact on the ability of EU citizens, of
whatever religious persuasion, to live and work where they choose.
Indeed I raised my concerns with the European Commission on this
particular matter last year, following the French ban in schools,
but did not receive any concrete answers to my enquiries. It is
for that reason, that I particularly want to see the matter
debated fully within the European Parliament when I shall voice my
continued support for the freedom to wear visible items of
religious dress.
Thank you for raising your concerns with me and do let me know if
I can be of further assistance to you..
Yours sincerely
Ian Hudghton MEP
Constituency Office, 8 Old Glamis Road,
Dundee DD3 8HP
Scotland
Tel: +44-1382-903206
ihmep.ne@snp.org
|
<<
Back
23rd Feb /2005
|
Thank you for your email of 17th February concerning the hijab ban
in France. However I am afraid that I am not prepared to sign the
written declaration on this subject.
I believe that rules regarding the clothes that children are
permitted to wear in schools are for national governments to
decide. France has a long standing secular tradition and I believe
it would be wrong for the EU to intervene to overturn the decision
of democratically elected French parliamentarians on this matter.
Yours sincerely
Theresa
Theresa Villiers MEP
Conservative Member of the European Parliament for London
Room 14E 116
European Parliament
47-53 rue Wiertz
B-1047 Brussels
Tel: 00322 284 5792, Fax: 00322 284 9792
Email:
tvilliers@europarl.eu.int
Website:
www.theresavilliers.com
|
<<
Back
23rd Feb /2005
|
I respect the right of
sovereign countries like France to legislate on domestic matters
such as dress code in their public institutions such as schools
and public buildings. France has a longstanding secular tradition
going back to the French revolution and understandably does not
wish to break a formula which has successfully integrated into the
mainstream of French society generations of immigrants from all
corners of the globe. It is noteworthy that the French legal ban
on the Hijab is part of a wider package against any ostentatious
religious symbol eg turbans, skullcaps or crucifixes which may
appear to divide schoolchildren from each other but discreet
symbols which are not making ostentatious political or religious
statements will be permitted.
Also it is interesting that a ban on the hijab in schools is
present in two muslim countries, Turkey and Tunisia as it is
regarded there as part of their secular traditions of government.
The UK is different as we unlike France do not have a tradition of
secular government and indeed have state funded faith schools.
For the reasons outlined above I regret that I cannot support your
campaign against the French law banning the hijab in schools.
Dr Charles Tannock MEP
London Region
Vice-Chairman EP delegation to EU-Ukraine PCC
Vice-Chairman Human Rights subcommittee of EP
EPP-ED Deputy Coordinator AFET
Office of Dr. Charles Tannock MEP
European Parliament
ASP 14 E 101
Rue Wiertz
B-1047 Brussels
Belgium
Tel: +32 2 2845870
Fax: +32 2 2849870
ctannock@europarl.eu.int
www.charlestannock.com
|
<<
Back
26th Oct /2004
|
Thank you for your letter to
Chris Huhne MEP
regarding French legislation on the wearing of the Hijab. I am his
Senior Advisor and he has asked me to reply on his behalf.
In his role as a European parliamentarian, Chris Huhne has always
fully supported the conviction that such
legislation constitutes a breach of fundamental human rights and
contravenes the law enshrined in Article 9 of the European
Convention on Human Rights, to which France is a signatory,
and Article 10 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the
European Union.
Liberal Democrat MEP Sarah Ludford, who is a member of the Civil
Liberties Committee, has been very active in this area. In a joint
letter with the Muslim Association of Britain and the Muslim Women
Society, she called upon French MPs to vote against the ban on
religious symbols in February of this year when the legislation
was voted through.
The Liberal Democrats have
also raised the debate twice this year in the European Parliament.
If I can be of any further assistance on this or any other matter
please do not hesitate to contact me.
With best wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Sharon Bowles
Senior Advisor to
Christopher Huhne MEP
chuhneoffice@cix.co.uk
|
<<
Back
24th Nov /2004
|

Written Declaration Signatory

Jill Evans
MEP
European Parliament Member for
Wales |
Thank you for your
interesting email on the subject of the Hijab ban (headscarf ban)
in France and other states in Europe.
I think it is a very complicated issue because there needs to be
the right balance between the neutrality of the state and the
freedom of the individual to exercise his or her beliefs.
The group I belong to in the European Parliament (Greens/European
Free Alliance) is against the ban in general.
This position is based upon the belief in a multicultural European
society which holds up the values of tolerance and peaceful
coexistence, and which strives to achieve a balance between
personal freedom and respect and equality for all.
We strongly defend the equal treatment of all beliefs and equality
between men and women. We condemn all forms of negative
discrimination against minorities.
I hope that this response has clarified my position on the issue.
Jill Evans MEP
|
<<
Back
01st October /2004
|
Thank you for your letter
expressing concern about the Hijab ban in France, and the impact
that this might have on Muslim women and girls in the rest of
Europe.
We naturally welcome the cultural and religious diversity of
British society, and are committed to
protecting the right to free expression of an individual's
religion, whether this entails the wearing of the Hijab, a
crucifix, a turban, or the Kippa. We will continue to oppose any
measures which threaten this right.
The British government will
not be seeking to adopt measures to ban the wearing of the Hijab
in British schools, and is closely monitoring the effect that the
French ban might have on British citizens and school children
living in France. Muslim women and girls living in Europe should
maintain the right to choose whether or not to wear the Hijab, and
we will continue to follow the issue as it arises in the European
Parliament.
Yours sincerely
Glenys Kinnock MEP and Eluned Morgan MEP
|
<<
Back
|
Written
Declaration Signatory

Claude Moraes Wallis MEP
Labour Member of the European Parliament for London
Dear Abdul,
Thank you for your email expressing concern about the Hijab ban in
France, and the impact that this might have on Muslim women and
girls in the rest of Europe.
As a Labour MEP representing London, I am proud to live in a city
which is rich in cultural and religious diversity, and I welcome
the benefits that this brings to British society. I strongly
support the right of all people to live in accordance with their
various religious beliefs and to express them freely. The banning
of the wearing of religious symbols goes against this freedom,
which has long been established in British society, and which I am
committed to protecting. It is therefore something that I am
deeply concerned about.
I recently spoke at a seminar on the right of Muslim women to wear
the Hijab, which was chaired by Abeer Pharaon, the co-ordinator of
the Assembly for the Protection of Hijab. During the 2000 - 2004
parliamentary term I had already begun to tackle the issue of the
right to wear religious symbols from a slightly different angle
through a written question on the implications for the Sikh
community of the banning of articles of religious faith. I have
just been elected chairman of the European Parliament's
cross-party Anti-Racism and Diversity Intergroup, where I am sure
the ban will be the subject of much discussion, and I shall
continue to raise the issue whenever possible in the European
Parliament.
The British government will not be seeking to adopt measures to
ban the wearing of the Hijab in British schools, and is monitoring
the effect that the French ban might have on British citizens and
school children living in France closely. I will work towards
ensuring that Muslim women and girls living in Europe maintain the
right to choose whether or not to wear the Hijab, and I will
continue to rigorously oppose any measures which threaten the
right to free religious expression throughout the next
parliamentary term and beyond.
With kind regards,
Claude Moraes MEP
Claude Moraes MEP
Labour MEP for London
t 00 44 20 7609 5005
f 00 44 20 7607 8299
www.claudemoraes.net
|
<<
Back
04th October /2004
|

Diana Wallis MEP
MEP for Yorkshire and the Humber
Dear Abdul,
Thank you for contacting me about the French National Assembly's
decision to introduce a new law on secularity, banning overt
religious symbols from state schools.
I share your alarm and was moved to write to President Chirac
ahead of the vote to express my deep concern about the
implications on the religious freedom of the French population.
I
attach a copy of the text of my letter for your information.
It is likely that the ban contradicts the universally recognised
freedom of religion; enshrined in both the Universal Declaration
and the European Convention on Human Rights. Certainly it would
appear to be in contravention of Article 9 of the European
Convention (which protects freedom of religion) and Article 14
(which forbids discrimination). There is strong British and German
case law to suggest that race and ethnic origin discrimination
rules can protect religious observance, for example in Mandla v
Lee a school which banned a Sikh for wearing a Turban was found to
have infringed discrimination legislation. British race relation's
law, as it stands at the moment, would prevent a similar ban here.
The ban does not facilitate integration of different faith
communities into French society. In fact, I believe such a ban
inflames further division and intolerance and may encourage racism
that can only benefit the extremists. This is a view shared by
Islamic and Human Rights groups across the region. Sadly, despite
the outcome of the inevitable legal challenges, I fear the
implications of this legislation will be felt in French society
for years to come.
Regards,
Diana Wallis MEP
letter from Diana Wallis MEP to Jacques Chirac in advance of
Parliament’s vote 10-02-04.
Dear Sir
RE: Proposed Legislation to Ban All Conspicuous Religious Symbols
I refer to the bill before the French parliament to ban all
conspicuous religious symbols from public institutions in France.
I am deeply concerned about the implications of such a ban on the
religious freedom of the French population as it would clearly
contradict the universally recognised freedom of religion;
enshrined in both the Universal Declaration and the European
Convention on Human Rights.
The proposed ban would not facilitate integration of different
faith communities into the French society. In fact, I believe such
a ban, if approved, would inflame further division and intolerance
and may encourage racism that can only benefit the extremists.
I am extremely concerned of the implications of such a law on
community relations in France.
I urge you to make a stand on the 10th of February for human
rights and freedom of religion and drop the proposed legislation.
Yours sincerely
Diana Wallis MEP
|
<<
Back
04th October /2004
|

Robert Evans MEP
Member of the European Parliamentary Labour
Party Bureau
Thank you for your email
expressing concern about the Hijab ban in France.
You mention the current Written Declaration in the European
Parliament. I am happy to sign the Declaration.
As a Labour MEP representing London I welcome the cultural and
religious diversity of British society, and I support the right of
all people to live in accordance with their religious
requirements. I am committed to protecting the right to free
____expression of religion, whether this entails the wearing of
the Hijab, a crucifix, a turban, or the Kippa, and will continue
to oppose any measures which threaten this right.
The British government will not be seeking to adopt measures to
ban the wearing of the Hijab in British schools, and is monitoring
the effect that the French ban might have on British citizens and
school children living in France closely. I will work towards
ensuring that Muslim women and girls living in Europe maintain the
right to choose whether or not to wear the Hijab, and I am
following the issue as it arises in the European Parliament very
closely.
When the French government made the proposal towards the end of
2003, I spoke forcefully against it in the European Parliament and
wrote a number of critical articles. I also put down my own
Written Declaration in May 2004. I have put below for your
information some of my speech to the European Parliament in
December 2003. In addition I have enclosed an article that I wrote
and which appeared in Asian Voice at the end of last year.
I will continue to speak out on this issue and seek to persuade
the French Government to reverse its policy.
Yours sincerely
Robert Evans MEP
Quoting by name Brent and Harrow / Hounslow and Ealing as examples
of local authorities who had shown positive initiatives to
integrate minority, Robert Evans MEP said the ban "will not
address the challenge that France faces in integrating Muslims and
other minorities into its society."
Mr Evans added that in London, " we found that the opposite policy
of respect for people's differences, respect for their different
religions is a much better way of incorporating minorities into
society."
December 2003, Asian Voice Article
The news that the French government is considering a ban on Muslim
girls wearing headscarves should be treated with dismay. From
everything we have learnt, certainly in this country and from
history in general, this seems to be a dangerous idea.
A state commission has proposed and President Chirac is now
considering whether or not to enforce it, that the hijab, and
other conspicuous religious costumes and signs, are not
appropriate wear for state schools. This would outlaw Jewish skull
caps, Sikh turbans and large crosses amongst other religious
items. The commission also proposes moves to prevent Muslims from
refusing education and medical care on religious grounds.
France has six million Muslims, Europe's largest Islamic community
and clearly sections of French society are worried about their
growing influence and the effect on traditional French culture.
But a clampdown on religious dress? That cannot be the answer!
This sort of ban has no place in modern society.
I am amazed that the French educational commission have not looked
at British examples. Our policies of peace and tolerance based on
respect for all religions and their customs has brought us a
multi-cultural society that works. Lots of people have worked very
hard over the years in schools, Race Equality Councils and other
organisations to promote tolerance. Any similar suggestion for
British schools would quite rightly get short shrift.
Indeed when sacred religious customs and places of worship are
challenged here, this country reacts with anger. When Jewish grave
stones are vandalised or Mosques attacked, whole communities
respond. The appalling attack on the Hindu Temple in Wembley at
Divali provoked a conference last Sunday attended by hundreds of
people. Police, politicians and devotees came together, not just
to condemn the attack and the paltry sentences handed out, but to
look at ways to improve security, to better educate the mindless
and to try to ensure that this sort of thing does not happen
again.
Of course, you cannot legislate against the minority, but you can
work to improve society and make it more tolerant and
understanding. That is what the British Hindu Forum is all about.
Personally I wish it every success. As for the French proposals, I
will point out in the European Parliament this week, what I
believe to be the dangers in their plans. I hope President Chirac
listens.
|
<<
Back
30th September/2004
|

Mary Honeyball - Labour Party MEP
Dear Ms Sakr,
Thank you for your letter expressing concern about the Hijab ban
in France, and the impact that this might have on Muslim women and
girls in the rest of Europe.
As a Labour MEP representing London I welcome the cultural and
religious diversity of British society, and I support the right of
all people to live in accordance with their religious
requirements. I am committed to protecting the right to free
expression of religion, whether this entails the wearing of the
Hijab, a crucifix, a turban, or the Kippa, and will continue to
oppose any measures which threaten this right.
The British government will not be seeking to adopt measures to
ban the wearing of the Hijab in British schools, and is monitoring
the effect that the French ban might have on British citizens and
school children living in France closely. I will work towards
ensuring that Muslim women and girls living in Europe maintain the
right to choose whether or not to wear the Hijab, and I am
following the issue as it arises in the European Parliament very
closely.
With kind regards,
Mary Honeyball MEP
ASP 13G 258
European Parliament
60 Rue Wiertz
1047 Brussels
Tel 0032 2 284 7209
Fax 0032 2 284 9209
|
<<
Back
30th September/2004
|

Written Declaration Signatory

Jean Lambert - Green Party MEP
Dear Alaa Sakr,
On behalf of Jean Lambert MEP, I would like
to thank you for your email regarding the Hijab ban in France. Mrs
Lambert, an advocate of the right to wear the Hijab, is pleased to
support action against the ban - but regrets it necessity.
The Green Party has been an active opponent
of the law in France and has been working closely with the
Association for the Protection of Hijab (ProHijab). An example of
this active support was the Green Party presence at the 4th of
September picket at the French embassy in London.
The Green Party is particularly concerned by
the spread of the ban to Germany and Belgium . In July of this
year it was reported that Berlin's city Government is considering
a law that would prohibit civil servants from wearing "religious
symbols" whilst at work. This represents a worrying trend that
must be resisted as it can only add to anti-Islamic feeling in
these countries.
The right to freedom of religion is stated
both in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights and
Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. which
both state that "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought,
conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his
religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with
others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or
belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance" . For this
reason Mrs. Lambert would like to stress, therefore, that this is
a question of protecting basic human rights. It should also be
noted that the right not to wear the Hijab is also a basic human
right.
For these reasons, Jean Lambert delivered a
particularly strongly worded speech when she spoke at a recent
cross party lobbying seminar organised by the Greens in the
European Parliament on the right to wear conspicuous religious
symbols. Commenting on the current restrictions initiated in
France , Mrs. Lambert stated that the new regulations were
"unwise" and "misguided" and could only fuel divisive racist,
anti-Islamic views.
For Jean Lambert this is about whose Europe
we want to create. The Greens oppose projecting the image of a
Europe where you can not belong if you are visually different.
This misguided approach runs contrary to the European Parliament
stance against discrimination and excludes people from being
active citizens.
Currently the Hijab issue is not yet high on
the Parliamentary agenda. For the Greens, the next step will be to
inform and persuade as many MEPs as is possible in order to
actively work towards having the ban lifted. Jean Lambert will
therefore be a primary signatory of the forthcoming Written
Declaration which can then be brought before the whole Parliament
if enough MEPs sign.
Two written declarations were already
submitted earlier this year on religious rights and freedoms, but
both these declarations have lapsed, due to the European
Parliament Elections. The new Declaration will call on the French
Government to reconsider its ban. It draws from the two earlier
documents and it is hoped that through greater cross party
collaboration on this issue a more successful outcome can be
achieved.
We urge you to write to other MEPs and make
them aware of the forthcoming Declaration.
You can view Written Declarations and chart
their progress on the European Parliament website at http://www.europarl.ep.ec
If
you have any further comments, questions or views, please don't
hesitate to contact me.
Yours
sincerely,
Liezle Barrie
Office of Jean Lambert, Green MEP for London
European Parliament 8G107
Rue
Wiertz 60
B
1047 Brussels
Tel:
+32 2 284 7507
Fax:
+32 2 284 9507
Email:
jelambert@europarl.eu.int
Website:
www.jeanlambertmep.org.uk
|
<<
Back
29th September/2004
|

Chris Heaton-Harris MEP
Dear Assembly
Thank you for your recent letter regarding the Hijab ban in
France. My colleagues and I in the Conservative Party support the
right of individuals to enjoy life's freedoms without fear of
persecution or violation of basic human rights. Individuals who
practice their beliefs in an acceptable manner, showing respect
and tolerance of others, who are likewise entitled to engage in
their own chosen faith, should be free to practice their religion
unhindered.
I respect the right of sovereign countries like France to
legislate on domestic matters such as dress code in their public
institutions such as schools and public buildings. France has a
longstanding secular tradition going back to the French revolution
and understandably does not wish to break a formula which has
successfully integrated into the mainstream of French society
generations of immigrants from all corners of the globe. It is
noteworthy that the French legal ban on the Hijab is part of a
wider package against any ostentatious religious symbol e.g.
turbans, skullcaps or crucifixes which may appear to divide
schoolchildren from each other but discrete symbols which are not
making ostentatious political or religious statements will be
permitted.
Also it is interesting that a ban on the Hijab in schools is
present in two Muslim countries, Turkey and Tunisia as it is
regarded there as part of their secular traditions of government.
The UK is different as we unlike France do not have a tradition of
secular government and indeed have state funded faith schools and
I would think very carefully before supporting any similar ban in
the UK; but I do believe this is a matter for the French.
Yours sincerely
Chris Heaton-Harris
Member of the European Parliament
Leo 14E157
Rue Wiertz
B-1047 Brussels
Belgium
Tel: 00322-284-7523
Fax: 00322-284-9523
Website:
www.heatonharris.org.uk
cheaton@europarl.eu.int
|
<<
Back
28th September/2004
 |
 |
|
Mr Jeffrey Titford, former Party
Leader
UK Independent Party / Eastern
Region |
Mr Tom Wise MEP
UK Independent Party /
Eastern Region |
Thank you for your email of 7 September 2004 regarding the Hijab
ban in France addressed to Jeffrey Titford MEP.
Mr Titford and Mr Wise our two MEPs in the Eastern Counties are
very much aware of this issue and have asked me to reply on their
behalf. We certainly share your concerns about the intolerance of
this ban and fervently hope that no such legislation would be
introduced in this country. However, with the huge influence
France has over EU affairs, one can never be certain.
Rest assured that our MEPs would not support such legislation and
will speak out against it whenever an opportunity presents itself.
Thank you for letting us know of your concerns.
Yours sincerely
Stuart Gulleford
Political Advisor - Eastern Counties
ukipeastadmin@intamail.com
|
<<
Back
|

Written Declaration (Author)

Baroness Sarah Ludford
MEP
Liberal Democrat Member of the European Parliament for London
Dear Assembly for the Protection of Hijab
Thank you for your letter regarding French legislation on the
wearing of the Hijab.
In my role as a European parliamentarian, I have always fully
supported the conviction that such legislation constitutes a
breach of fundamental human rights and contravenes the law
enshrined in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights,
to which France is a signatory, and Article 10 of the Charter of
Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Accordingly, in a joint letter with the Muslim Association of
Britain and the Muslim Women Society, I called upon French MPs to
vote against the ban on religious symbols in February of this year
when the legislation was voted through.
I have also raised the debate twice this year in the European
Parliament (see below for the text of my speeches) and signed two
European Parliament Written Declarations on religious rights and
freedoms in France and the European Union.
I hope you will find the attached briefing note my office has
prepared on the wearing of the Hijab an interesting and fruitful
read, which outlines the Liberal Democrat line on this issue.
28th January 2004:
Ludford (ELDR). - Mr President,
I want to raise the issue of various moves in some Member States,
notably France, to ban the wearing of so-called overt religious
symbols. The spotlight has fallen in particular on the hijab, the
Muslim headscarf. In order to be consistent and
non-discriminatory, any such bans would affect the Sikh turban,
the Jewish kippa or skullcap, and Christian crosses. Such bans are
misguided.
Apart from the purely pragmatic argument that if you ban something
then people want to do it, there are strong human rights arguments
as to why banning is unacceptable. I refer in particular to
Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which
guarantees the right to manifest one's religious observance in
public. These guarantees are, of course, echoed in our own Charter
of Fundamental Rights. It must surely be arguable that a ban would
breach the EU directive on equal treatment regardless of race or
religion.
Before France or other Member States find themselves condemned
before the Strasbourg or Luxembourg courts they need to remember
that a European model of integration rests on respect for
differences and freedom to choose, not on illiberal imposition of
uniformity.
25th February 2004:
Ludford (ELDR). - Mr President,
I draw attention to the fact that in a recent Eurobarometer poll
European voters identified the subject of immigration among the
top four issues for the forthcoming election campaign.
We have a situation in which Member States in the last five years
have so far failed in their Treaty obligation to establish a
common asylum and immigration policy offering a reassurance of
orderly control of asylum and immigration, a level playing field
and responsibility-sharing. They have made a complete mess of free
movement from the new Member States and in some Member States -
such as my own - there has been complete hysteria from the popular
press; there is a worrying rise in anti-Semitism and Islamophobia;
passions have been
inflamed by the proposed ban in France on the wearing of
headscarves, and so on.
We therefore face quite a dangerous situation. Mr President, when
you meet the heads of government at the forthcoming summit, would
you ask them to do everything in their power to ensure that the
subjects of immigration, asylum and the integration of immigrant
communities are handled with sensitivity and tact so that we
ensure that there is no extremist success at the forthcoming
elections?
Kind regards,
Nadia Verjee
Political Assistant to Baroness Ludford MEP
(T) +32 2 284 7104
(F) +32 2 284 9104
www.sarahludfordmep.org.uk
|
<<
Back
|

Written Declaration Signatory

Stephen Hughes MEP
Labour MEP North East of England
---------------- Reply to
ProHijab ----------------------
Thank you for your e-mailed message of
7th September 2004 concerning the Hijab ban in France.
I am grateful to your for contacting me with your views.
I shall keep them in mind when this issue is discussed in the
European Parliament.
Yours sincerely
Stephen Hughes MEP
Room 4/38
County Hall
Durham
DH1 5UR
Tel: 0191 3849371
Fax: 0191 3846100
|
<< | |