There has been a rise in religious hate crime since
the London attacks
|
A Muslim women's group has
criticised a suggestion they should stop wearing headscarves
for fear of hate attacks.
The Assembly for the Protection of the
Hijab said wearing the traditional Islamic scarf was a duty
and compromising was giving in to violence.
But chairman of the Council of Mosques
and Imams Dr Zaki Badawi said removal was justified, as
wearing it in the present climate might invite harm.
Dr Badawi's ruling comes after a huge
rise in faith hate crimes in London.
| |
Dress is meant to protect from harm, not to invite
it

|
The Metropolitan Police said on
Wednesday that there were 269 crimes in the three weeks after
the 7 July bombings, compared with 40 in the same period of
2004.
Dr Badawi, who is seen as a
progressive Muslim leader who advocates integration, warned
that "a woman wearing the hijab... could suffer aggression
from irresponsible elements".
"In the present tense situation, with
the rise of attacks on Muslims, we advise Muslim women who
fear being attacked physically or verbally to remove their
hijab so as not to be identified by those hostile to Muslims."
The hijab was designed to identify
women as Muslim and thus protect them from molestation, he
said, so if it led to harassment it ought not to be worn.
"Dress is meant to protect from harm,
not to invite it," he added.
Dr Badawi said he had sought to
clarify the situation after being approached by a concerned
woman.
His ruling did not mean that women
should not wear the headscarf, but simply gave them the choice
to remove it if they felt threatened, he said.
'Identities'
But Rajnaara Akhtar, of the Assembly
for the Protection of the Hijab, said women should not abandon
the key outward symbol of their faith.
To remove the headscarf denies women's
"identities as Muslims", she said.
 |
HAVE YOUR SAY
I have no intention whatsoever of abandoning
something which is essential to my faith

Elaine Nawaz, Reading,
UK
|
She added that the Koran only allowed
woman to remove the hijab if they feared for their lives.
"It's not about life and death. It's
not so extreme that if we step out of our house with our hijab
we are going to get attacked."
She added that most people in Britain
understood that those who attacked London were not Muslims.
Stop-and-search
The London mayor's human rights
adviser, Yasmin Quereshi, said the only people who should
change their behaviour are those who seek to intimidate or
attack Muslims.
"As we would not say to Jewish people
that they should not wear the skull-cap, or say to Christians
to hide their crosses or Sikhs to take off their turbans, so
Muslim women have a right to wear the hijab and this right
should be defended."
Met Police Assistant Commissioner
Tarique Ghaffur said there was no doubt that incidents
"impacting on" the Muslim community had increased.
Dr Badawi said the hijab
should not be worn if it invited attacks
|
Communities were also frustrated by
the increased use of stop-and-search and the new
"shoot-to-kill to protect" policy for suicide bombers, he
said.
"It can lead to these communities
completely retreating and not engaging at a time when we want
their engagement and support," he warned.
A spokesman for the Muslim Safety
Forum, an umbrella group which works closely with the police,
said the figures reflected a recent increase in calls to their
members about abuse and attacks.
The figures emerged as Home Office
minister Hazel Blears held the first in a series of meetings
with Muslim community groups.
Ahead of the meeting, Ms Blears
pledged that Muslims would not be discriminated against by
police trying to prevent potential terror attacks.
She also opposed racial profiling,
saying stop and searches should be based on good intelligence,
not just skin colour.